SNP Council
ignores Garnock opinion and chooses “worst” site for
school
Councillor John
Bell attacked the “disgraceful decision” of SNP Councillors to defy the majority
local opinion in the Garnock Valley, and the opinion of the Council’s own
consultants, on the site of the proposed new Garnock Campus.
At a recent
Council meeting on the preferred site for the Campus, it became clear that the
ruling SNP group is determined to site the Campus at Longbar, Beith despite
sites in this area being previously rejected following extensive consultation
with parents and pupils. Consultants commissioned by the Council had recommended
2 sites, off Largs Road and off Stoneyholm Road, as providing the best
opportunity. The consultants also judged that the Longbar site was the worst of
all the options available.
Councillor John
Bell said
“The SNP’s
decision to ignore the views of Garnock Valley voters on this matter is
wrong-headed and illogical.
"Choosing Longbar
as the site would be a disaster for parents and pupils in Kilbirnie and Beith as
well as Kilbirnie town centre shops and businesses. The Longbar site is isolated
and too far from the main housing areas and will mean an increased reliance on
cars and buses to get kids to school. It will also mean that pupils from Beith
will have a long and exposed walk, in all weathers, to the SNP’s preferred
site. The SNP seem more eager to save money by cutting free school transport for
Beith pupils than they do in choosing the best site for the
Campus.”
The children from loadingbank and glengarnock have a long exposed walk and have done for many a year so why all the concern now about that ?and as for the town missing out on business do you mean all the healthyeating establishments the town is blessed with ?maybe if the children have no option but to eat in school healthy eating can be implemented
ReplyDeleteHi Graeme I dont think adding an extra half mile to that long and exposed route is a logical thing to do.
ReplyDelete